1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf01404745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A co-culture system for studies of paracrine effects of stromal cells on the growth of epithelial cells

Abstract: SUMMARY:We have developed a co-culture system to study paracrine effects of fetal mesenchyme cells on the growth of primary mammary epithelial cells of the mouse. The method should be adaptable for study of interaction of a variety of cell populations. The procedure is simple and inexpensive. The culture consists of four layers: a monolayer of mesenchyme cells on a plastic culture dish, a soft agarose layer overlaying the cell monolayer, epithelial cells suspended in collagen gel placed atop the agarose, and c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mouse mammary epithelial cells in primary culture responded to salivary mesenchyme cells and mammary fat pad precursor cells of fetal mice, with increased growth rates in a collagen gel matrix and with formation of colonies from single cells in a soft agarose gel. These stimulatory effects on mammary epithelial cells were exerted by diffusible factors released from stromal cells separated from the epithelial target cells by a permeable agarose barrier (Kanazawa and Hosick, 1992). Conditioned medium mimicked the effects of co-cultured stromal cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Mouse mammary epithelial cells in primary culture responded to salivary mesenchyme cells and mammary fat pad precursor cells of fetal mice, with increased growth rates in a collagen gel matrix and with formation of colonies from single cells in a soft agarose gel. These stimulatory effects on mammary epithelial cells were exerted by diffusible factors released from stromal cells separated from the epithelial target cells by a permeable agarose barrier (Kanazawa and Hosick, 1992). Conditioned medium mimicked the effects of co-cultured stromal cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We have not investigated why this difference exists, but we suspect that it relates to the use of collagen gels inside the insert; collagen may block the pores, or alternatively pores may not become fluid filled, thus preventing diffusion of solubilized molecules. The co-culture configuration as used here (Kanazawa and Hosick, 1992) may be preferable when target cells are suspended within a gel. We have also utilized a co-culture system similar to that described by Montesano et al (1991)) in which both cell types are suspended in collagen gels separated by a cell-free collagen gel layer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Cell interactions can occur directly through cell–cell contact and indirectly through the diffusion of factors secreted by one cell that act on the specific receptors of another cell [Grellier et al, ]. To assess these interactions, co‐culture models in which two or more distinct cell populations are grown in the same environment have been used [Kanazawa and Hosick, ]. This approach allows for a partial mimicking of the in vivo environment during in vitro evaluations, keeping co‐cultured cells in direct contact with secreted cytokines and autocrine and paracrine factors [Malekshah et al, ; Bigdeli et al, ].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%