A theory of truth is usually demanded to be consistent, but ωconsistency is less frequently requested. Recently, Yatabe [32] has argued in favor of ω-inconsistent first-order theories of truth, minimizing their odd consequences. In view of this fact, in this paper we present five arguments against ω-inconsistent theories of truth. In order to bring out this point, we will focus on two very well-known ω-inconsistent theories of truth: the classical theory of symmetric truth FS and the non-classical theory of naïve truth based on Lukasiewicz infinitely-valued logic: PA LT.