2022
DOI: 10.1029/2021wr031045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Co‐Spectral Budget Model Links Turbulent Eddies to Suspended Sediment Concentration in Channel Flows

Abstract: The vertical distribution of suspended sediment concentration remains a subject of active research given its relevance to a plethora of problems in hydraulics, hydrology, ecology, and water quality control. Many of the classical theories developed over the course of 90 years represent the effects of turbulence on suspended sediments (SS) using an effective mixing length or eddy diffusivity without explicitly accounting for the energetics of turbulent eddies across scales. To address this gap, the turbulent flu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 83 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, u2 ${u}_{\ast }^{2}$ = g o S o H and the bulk velocity U b = Q /( BH ). The bulk turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate can now be determined from bulk variables as ϵb=Ub()goSo=()Ub/Hu2 ${{\epsilon}}_{b}={U}_{b}\left({g}_{o}{S}_{o}\right)=\left({U}_{b}/H\right){u}_{\ast }^{2}$ enabling an estimate of a bulk Kolmogorov micro‐scale eddy size ηb=ν3/ϵb1/4 ${\eta }_{b}={\left({\nu }^{3}/{{\epsilon}}_{b}\right)}^{1/4}$ to be compared with reported grain diameter d p without any z dependency for convenience (S. Li et al., 2022). In all model calculations, the local ϵ ( z ) is used in the estimation of η(z)=ν3/ϵfalse(zfalse)1/4 $\eta (z)={\left[{\nu }^{3}/{\epsilon}(z)\right]}^{1/4}$.…”
Section: Experiments and Model Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, u2 ${u}_{\ast }^{2}$ = g o S o H and the bulk velocity U b = Q /( BH ). The bulk turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate can now be determined from bulk variables as ϵb=Ub()goSo=()Ub/Hu2 ${{\epsilon}}_{b}={U}_{b}\left({g}_{o}{S}_{o}\right)=\left({U}_{b}/H\right){u}_{\ast }^{2}$ enabling an estimate of a bulk Kolmogorov micro‐scale eddy size ηb=ν3/ϵb1/4 ${\eta }_{b}={\left({\nu }^{3}/{{\epsilon}}_{b}\right)}^{1/4}$ to be compared with reported grain diameter d p without any z dependency for convenience (S. Li et al., 2022). In all model calculations, the local ϵ ( z ) is used in the estimation of η(z)=ν3/ϵfalse(zfalse)1/4 $\eta (z)={\left[{\nu }^{3}/{\epsilon}(z)\right]}^{1/4}$.…”
Section: Experiments and Model Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%