“…Various strategies have been developed to tackle the issues mentioned above. − One of the most important strategies focuses on constructing various composites as sulfur host materials, such as carbon materials, , metal oxides, − and metal sulfides. − Yet, nonpolar carbon exhibits inferior physical adsorption to the polar intermediate polysulfides, which cannot effectively prevent the dissolution of polysulfides . While polar materials such as Co 3 O 4 and TiO 2 act as chemical trappers toward LiPSs, they have intrinsically low electrical conductivity, which makes them unable to diffuse/transform polysulfides in time, leading to a slow redox reaction. , Therefore, an ideal sulfur carrier should simultaneously realize LiPS adsorption/trapping, which is very critical to achieve an outstanding cycling stability. Currently, transition-metal sulfides (TMSs) have aroused great research interest due to their unique metallic conductivity compared with corresponding metal oxides and appropriate adsorption capacity toward LiPSs. , For example, Zhang et al introduced NiS 2 nanoparticles into graphene used as the sulfur host material, which exhibited a high specific capacity of 400 mAh g –1 over 800 cycles at 1 C with almost 98% Coulombic efficiency, benefiting from the chemical adsorption of LiPSs to NiS 2 nanoparticles .…”