2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-44124-4_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Coalgebraic View of Characteristic Formulas in Equational Modal Fixed Point Logics

Abstract: The literature on process theory and structural operational semantics abounds with various notions of behavioural equivalence and, more generally, simulation preorders. An important problem in this area from the point of view of logic is to find formulas that characterize states in finite transition systems with respect to these various relations. Recent work by Aceto et al. shows how such characterizing formulas in equational modal fixed point logics can be obtained for a wide variety of behavioural preorders… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results, generalized in [2, Corollary IV.3.2.3], stem from a different point of view as the one taken here, as they allow for a "change-base-base", namely passing from V = P + to V = 2 by modifying the underlying monad, whereas the current work fixes the quantale V . Second, the study of lax extensions is rooted in topology and order theory, but current trends show that it is in no way limited to these fields, as the cited references show, but also [6] and [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results, generalized in [2, Corollary IV.3.2.3], stem from a different point of view as the one taken here, as they allow for a "change-base-base", namely passing from V = P + to V = 2 by modifying the underlying monad, whereas the current work fixes the quantale V . Second, the study of lax extensions is rooted in topology and order theory, but current trends show that it is in no way limited to these fields, as the cited references show, but also [6] and [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%