2014
DOI: 10.1017/s0960129514000449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A coalgebraic view on decorated traces

Abstract: In concurrency theory, various semantic equivalences on transition systems are based on traces decorated with some additional observations, generally referred to as decorated traces. Using the generalized powerset construction, recently introduced by a subset of the authors (Silva, Bonchi, Bonsangue & Rutten 2010), we give a coalgebraic presentation of decorated trace semantics. The latter include ready, failure, (complete) trace, possible-futures, ready trace and failure trace semantics for labeled transition… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and determinise the NA o, t : X → 2 × (PX) A . The induced semantics ≡ LT S on the state space X is the standard trace semantics for LTS [59].…”
Section: From Systems To Automatamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and determinise the NA o, t : X → 2 × (PX) A . The induced semantics ≡ LT S on the state space X is the standard trace semantics for LTS [59].…”
Section: From Systems To Automatamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original functor P ↓ ω (A × (−)) then transformed into G by mapping S to {(π 1 [S], a, x) | (a, x) ∈ S} for S = ∅, where π 1 denotes the first projection, and to the unique element of 1 otherwise. This is similar to decoration-oriented coalgebraic approaches to trace semantics [4].…”
Section: Behavioural Preorders Via Graded Monadsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Equivalences may be defined by distinguishing suitable modal logics [18], while we pursue the opposite approach of designing characteristic logics for given equivalences or preorders. Variations within trace-type equivalences, such as complete or ready trace semantics, can be captured via so-called decorations [4]. In recent work [19], Kupke and Rot present a highly general fibrational framework for coinductive predicates and their characteristic logics.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Behavioural equivalence in EM(T ) then amounts to desired notions of equivalence. For instance: language equivalence of non-deterministic automata; weighted automata [7]; Mealy and Moore machines with side-effects [43]; or various types of trace equivalence of transition systems [8]. An illustrative non-example of this general determinisation procedure is in a natural construction of belief-state transformers from probabilistic automata, which feature both non-determinism and probabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%