2019
DOI: 10.1109/tim.2018.2853958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Coarse-to-Fine Model for Rail Surface Defect Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The visual saliency detection model is a process in which computer vision algorithms are used to predict which information in an image or video receives more visual attention. Yu et al [ 93 ] considered the significance of track defects and the regularity of background when detecting rail surface defects; then, they selected pure phase Fourier transform (POFTs) to locate defects. Similarly, Song et al [ 94 ] calculated saliency mapping of grayscale images in order to detect micro-cracks on the surface of steel beams, and they defined central hole-out as a square template for the convolution of filter operator and binarized saliency mapping.…”
Section: Taxonomy Of Two-dimension Defect Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The visual saliency detection model is a process in which computer vision algorithms are used to predict which information in an image or video receives more visual attention. Yu et al [ 93 ] considered the significance of track defects and the regularity of background when detecting rail surface defects; then, they selected pure phase Fourier transform (POFTs) to locate defects. Similarly, Song et al [ 94 ] calculated saliency mapping of grayscale images in order to detect micro-cracks on the surface of steel beams, and they defined central hole-out as a square template for the convolution of filter operator and binarized saliency mapping.…”
Section: Taxonomy Of Two-dimension Defect Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5) The surface detection system needs to work continuously. Manual inspection is inefficient and has a low sensitivity [2], [32], which will slow down the entire manufacturing process. Compared with the manual inspection, nondestructive testing methods, such as ultrasonic testing, acoustic emission testing, and magnetic flux leakage [3], have a higher sensitivity and data interaction in the industrial inspection.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the manual inspection, nondestructive testing methods, such as ultrasonic testing, acoustic emission testing, and magnetic flux leakage [3], have a higher sensitivity and data interaction in the industrial inspection. However, most of them are time intensive [2] to the target motion and the detected defects lack the intuitive descriptions of defects' shapes. A machine vision has more advantages in surface defects testing.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations