2021
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2020.3006533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Coarse-to-Fine Two-Stage Attentive Network for Haze Removal of Remote Sensing Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, we compare our method with seven classical dehazing methods, including some deep learning methods, and evalute them overall. The comparative typical methods including DCP [6,26], NLD [8,32], CAP [9], PFF-Net [12], W-U-Net [13], EPDN [14], and FCTF-Net [15]. Here, the guided image filtering [26] is applied to DCP to further improve the estimation accuracy of transmission.…”
Section: Results Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this section, we compare our method with seven classical dehazing methods, including some deep learning methods, and evalute them overall. The comparative typical methods including DCP [6,26], NLD [8,32], CAP [9], PFF-Net [12], W-U-Net [13], EPDN [14], and FCTF-Net [15]. Here, the guided image filtering [26] is applied to DCP to further improve the estimation accuracy of transmission.…”
Section: Results Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original purpose of the above-mentioned methods is to dehaze the ground images. For the hazy RS images, Li et al [15] proposed a firstcoarse-then-fine two-stage dehazing network named FCTF-Net. In the first stage, the encoder-decoder architecture is used to extract multi-scale features.…”
Section: Dehazing Methods Based On Deep Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To objectively evaluate the aerial image dehazing performance, we compare our method with DCP [6], DehazeNet [19], FCTF [30] and CGAN [29]. Table 5 and Figure 7 show quantitative and qualitative results on the SateHaze1k dataset, respectively.…”
Section: ) Evaluation On Satehaze1k Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…datasets have been established, such as SateHaze1k (three levels of fog, namely thin, moderate, and thick fog) [29], UN-HAZE (uniform haze-clear image pairs) [30], and NONUN-HAZE (nonuniform haze-clear image pairs) [30]. On the other hand, the recent aerial image dehazing algorithms exhibit remarkable performance, such as MRCNN [32], H2RL-Net [31], and RSDehazeNet [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We employ 64 challenging images to address these challenges, and we compare ST-UNet with other state-of-the art dehazing DNNs, i.e., DehazeNet, (5) DEFADE, (12) SID, (13) NLD, (14) CAP, (15) PFF-Net, (16) W-U-Net, (17) and FCTF-Net. (18) We set the input image size to 512 × 512 for all DNNs as shown in Fig. 3.…”
Section: Quantitative Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%