2017 IEEE 85th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/vtcspring.2017.8108433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Code-Aided and Moment-Based Joint SNR Estimation for M-APSK over AWGN Channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conventionally, SNR estimators require knowledge of the signal or the channel, such as the maximum likelihood (ML) SNR estimator [ 26 ] and particle swarm optimization (PSO) SNR estimator, based on parameters of hardwares or channels [ 27 ]. In addition, there exist estimators designed for specific signals or specific feature spectrum sensing methods, such as the SNR estimator [ 28 ] for M-ary amplitude phase shift keying (M-APSK) modulated signals, the SNR estimator for signal with Polar code [ 29 ], and the estimator for eigenvalue-based spectrum detectors [ 30 ]. Lacking the prior knowledge of the signal/channel and design for specific signals/sensing methods make it hard to generally adopt the above estimators to various CUAVNs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventionally, SNR estimators require knowledge of the signal or the channel, such as the maximum likelihood (ML) SNR estimator [ 26 ] and particle swarm optimization (PSO) SNR estimator, based on parameters of hardwares or channels [ 27 ]. In addition, there exist estimators designed for specific signals or specific feature spectrum sensing methods, such as the SNR estimator [ 28 ] for M-ary amplitude phase shift keying (M-APSK) modulated signals, the SNR estimator for signal with Polar code [ 29 ], and the estimator for eigenvalue-based spectrum detectors [ 30 ]. Lacking the prior knowledge of the signal/channel and design for specific signals/sensing methods make it hard to generally adopt the above estimators to various CUAVNs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%