2022
DOI: 10.1080/2153599x.2021.2006294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cognitive account of manipulative sympathetic magic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be reiterated that although the reporting bias is likely to be a general feature of information transmission in human societies, it is only one of the many factors that contributes to the persistence of ineffective technologies, such as fetal sex prognostication. For one thing, many sex prognostication methods may be intuitively plausible either due to our evolved psychology (Hong, 2022a; Miton, Claidière, and Mercier, 2015) or culturally transmitted background beliefs (Hong, 2022b). For example, in ancient China, the yin‐yang and the Five Phases principles were deeply ingrained into its culture (Zhou, 2020), so theories about fetal sex prognostication grounded in these established belief systems would appear more plausible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be reiterated that although the reporting bias is likely to be a general feature of information transmission in human societies, it is only one of the many factors that contributes to the persistence of ineffective technologies, such as fetal sex prognostication. For one thing, many sex prognostication methods may be intuitively plausible either due to our evolved psychology (Hong, 2022a; Miton, Claidière, and Mercier, 2015) or culturally transmitted background beliefs (Hong, 2022b). For example, in ancient China, the yin‐yang and the Five Phases principles were deeply ingrained into its culture (Zhou, 2020), so theories about fetal sex prognostication grounded in these established belief systems would appear more plausible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, as mentioned previously, there is no guarantee that attempts of theory construction always produce the right theory or even a good theory. At the population level, although payoff‐biased transmission based on genetically evolved preferences would disfavor wrong theories, humans may construct and transmit theories for other reasons, such as content bias (Henrich and McElreath, 2003): traditional theories of illness (Murdock, 1980) and principles of magic (Hong, 2022a) and divination (Hong and Henrich, 2021) may spread in human societies partly because of their intuitive plausibility. Additionally, constructing the right theory in certain domains may be objectively difficult and require cumulative progress; thus, if the initial construction of theories is more likely to be “wrong,” then it might present a significant barrier for eventually arriving at the right theory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, from the perspective of the observer, how magical actions achieve some worldly outcome has no knowable physical-causal pathway. This account of magic suffers from a major issue: Ample historical and ethnographic evidence shows that many magic practices are genuine instrumental efforts and the practitioners often believe that they possess the causal knowledge regarding how the putative outcomes are produced by their actions (Edmonds, 2019;Hong, 2022a). My study on Chinese rainmaking, for example, shows that ancient scholars have explicitly theorized the mechanisms of how specific "ritual" actions causes rain, and many rainmaking methods were the direct results of cosmological theories in a way not very different from modern engineers designing practical solutions to pressing problem based on their understanding of the causal nature of the problem (Hong et al, forthcoming).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%