A cognitive-behavioral approach to substance abuse prevention: One-year follow-up

Botvin, Gilbert J.; Baker, Eli; Filazzola, Anne D.; Botvin, Elizabeth M.

doi:10.1016/0306-4603(90)90006-j

Cited by 283 publications

(151 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

135

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Taken together with the finding that interventions that included a booster session were more effective than those without 30, 31, 32, 51, the data suggest that the repeated communication of health messages over an extended time‐period may have a more pronounced impact on the behaviour of young people.…”

Section: Implications and Other Evidencementioning

confidence: 63%

“…In eight studies 19, 20, 33, 34, 35, 37, 39, 52, peers of a similar age were nominated by their classmates, while in four studies, older‐age peers were selected by staff or researchers 32, 36, 51, 53. In other programmes, PLs either volunteered 31, 36, 38 or the age or method of selection was unclear.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Where this was not reported, odds ratios (ORs) were calculated in Stata (version 13.1) using the raw data 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36. For continuous outcomes, the standardized mean difference (SMD) was calculated and converted to a log OR 20, 37, 38, 39 using standard methods 40 (InlogOR = d(π/sqrt)3).…”

Section: Data Extraction and Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Peer‐led interventions to prevent tobacco, alcohol and/or drug use among young people aged 11–21 years: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and AimsPeer‐led interventions may offer a beneficial approach in preventing substance use, but their impact has not yet been quantified. We conducted a systematic review to investigate and quantify the effect of peer‐led interventions that sought to prevent tobacco, alcohol and/or drug use among young people aged 11–21 years.MethodsMedline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ERIC and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to July 2015 without language restriction. We included randomized controlled trials only. Screening and data extraction were conducted in duplicate and data from eligible studies were pooled in a random effects meta‐analysis.ResultsWe identified 17 eligible studies, approximately half of which were school‐based studies targeting tobacco use among adolescents. Ten studies targeting tobacco use could be pooled, representing 13 706 young people in 220 schools. Meta‐analysis demonstrated that the odds of smoking were lower among those receiving the peer‐led intervention compared with control [odds ratio (OR) = 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.62–0.99, P = 0.040]. There was evidence of heterogeneity (I 2 = 41%, χ2 15.17, P = 0.086). Pooling of six studies representing 1699 individuals in 66 schools demonstrated that peer‐led interventions were also associated with benefit in relation to alcohol use (OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.65–0.99, P = 0.036), while three studies (n = 976 students in 38 schools) suggested an association with lower odds of cannabis use (OR = 0.70, 0.50–0.97, P = 0.034). No studies were found that targeted other illicit drug use.ConclusionsPeer interventions may be effective in preventing tobacco, alcohol and possibly cannabis use among adolescents, although the evidence base is limited overall, and is characterized mainly by small studies of low quality.

show abstract

Section: Implications and Other Evidencementioning

confidence: 63%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Peer‐led interventions to prevent tobacco, alcohol and/or drug use among young people aged 11–21 years: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These include universal school-based programs such as Life Skills Training (LST), a 3-year middle school classroom curriculum that teaches students personal self-management, social, and drug-resistance skills. LST has been found to produce sustained effects in preventing adolescent tobacco use (Botvin et al, 1980(Botvin et al, , 2003, alcohol use (Botvin et al, 2000), binge drinking (Botvin et al, 2001), and marijuana use (Botvin et al, 1990). A high school curriculum called Project Towards No Drug Abuse has produced sustained reductions in cigarette, marijuana, and other illicit drug use in both general and alternative high schools (Dent et al, 2001;Rohrbach et al, 2010;Sun et al, 2008;Sussman et al, 2002).…”

Section: Alcohol Tobacco and Other Drug Usementioning

confidence: 99%

Unleashing the Power of Prevention

Hawkins¹,

Jenson²,

Catalano³

et al. 2015

NAM Perspectives

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…These studies have provided evidence for the effectiveness of booster sessions after the initial program delivery (Botvin et al 1983) and have compared the use of peers and teachers as pro gram facilitators (Botvin et al 1990b). Other studies have replicated the short-term effectiveness of the pro gram with African American and Hispanic adolescents (Botvin et al 1989a(Botvin et al ,b, 1992.…”

Section: Life Skills Training Programmentioning

confidence: 99%

Randomized Trial of Reduced-Nicotine Standards for Cigarettes

Goldstein

2016

N Engl J Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A cognitive-behavioral approach to substance abuse prevention: One-year follow-up

Cited by 283 publications

References 23 publications

Peer‐led interventions to prevent tobacco, alcohol and/or drug use among young people aged 11–21 years: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Peer‐led interventions to prevent tobacco, alcohol and/or drug use among young people aged 11–21 years: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Unleashing the Power of Prevention

Randomized Trial of Reduced-Nicotine Standards for Cigarettes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About