2023
DOI: 10.1109/tcds.2022.3175360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Cognitive-Driven Ordinal Preservation for Multimodal Imbalanced Brain Disease Diagnosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another contribution is that a triplet-based ordinal locality regularization was added to reveal the underlying ranking information of multi-site subjects from different classes, and jointly selected the common features in different modalities. Most of the previous methods focused on the relationships between labels and samples or the simple dependence between samples after mapping the original feature space into a new space, ignoring the discriminative information among samples [17]. Our method accurately preserves intrinsic structural information among subjects in each modality by retaining ranking information within each sample's neighborhood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another contribution is that a triplet-based ordinal locality regularization was added to reveal the underlying ranking information of multi-site subjects from different classes, and jointly selected the common features in different modalities. Most of the previous methods focused on the relationships between labels and samples or the simple dependence between samples after mapping the original feature space into a new space, ignoring the discriminative information among samples [17]. Our method accurately preserves intrinsic structural information among subjects in each modality by retaining ranking information within each sample's neighborhood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of pairwise similarity measures or other simple metrics to represent complex structural relationships among subjects results in the loss of topological structure information. Besides, due to intra-modality heterogeneity, including class imbalance, data distribution heterogeneity, and label inconsistencies [17], brings challenges in selecting discriminative features. Moreover, these methods overlook the challenges of the use of multisite data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation metrics AUC, F-measure and G-mean are widely used to evaluate the classification performance of machine learning models for imbalanced data classification [12][13][14]. To facilitate the introduction of the calculation rules of the evaluation metrics, the confusion matrix was first established, as detailed in Table 1.…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Metricmentioning
confidence: 99%