1987
DOI: 10.21236/ada192688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Cognitive Model for Exposition of Human Deception and Counterdeception

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…with Donald's profile being reckless and θ = 0.51. Donald's decision-making process corresponds to the instantiation of the backward-reasoning from (5) to (16) and in the semantics rule Ask1, which ends with Donald responding that the bmw is safe (16). Ivan receives the message, which corresponds to the semantics rule Response1, given that, though Ivan profile is sceptical, it trusts Donald i.e., α = 0.8.…”
Section: Decision Making and Communication Semanticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…with Donald's profile being reckless and θ = 0.51. Donald's decision-making process corresponds to the instantiation of the backward-reasoning from (5) to (16) and in the semantics rule Ask1, which ends with Donald responding that the bmw is safe (16). Ivan receives the message, which corresponds to the semantics rule Response1, given that, though Ivan profile is sceptical, it trusts Donald i.e., α = 0.8.…”
Section: Decision Making and Communication Semanticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other works on deception that have to be mentioned: [26] models deception using argumentation in dialogue games; [15] models self-deception using epistemic logic; [24] and [23] define multiple types of deception using a modal logic of belief and action; [5] describes the difference between lies, bullshit and deception; and [16] builds a cognitive model of deception based on human-computer interaction, which specifies how the computer agent's strategies of deception should be improved by the agent's programmer after being defeated by a human in a battleships game.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…falsely appearing to be a member of a group, or false denial of group membership. o Deception in general [10] Communication of cognitive states o Normal mental conditions o Cognition under stress [13]  Fatigue, lack of sleep, and exhaustion  Noise and thermal extremes  Task urgency and time pressures  Hypervigilance, rapid attention shifting  Feeling of isolation due to scarcity of human and material resources.  Mental impairment due to environmental hazards, e.g.…”
Section: Cognition and Emergency Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretically, these studies are of interest to psychologists concerned with eyewitness testimony, especially those researching human deception (e.g., Whaley, 1985;Lambert, 1987;Wiseman & Morris, 1992). On a more pragmatic level, this work is of interest to individuals who are required to accurately observe, and recall, potential acts of deception.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%