2014
DOI: 10.1186/1687-1499-2014-191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cognitive QoS management framework for WLANs

Abstract: Due to the precipitous growth of wireless networks and the paucity of spectrum, more interference is imposed to the wireless terminals which constraints their performance. In order to preserve such performance degradation, this paper proposes a framework which uses cognitive radio techniques for quality of service (QoS) management of wireless local area networks (LANs). The framework incorporates radio environment maps as input to a cognitive decision engine that steers the network to optimize its QoS paramete… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this condition, the dominant external parameters influencing the throughput of the SUT is the traffic characterization of the homogeneous collocated interference links. As authors in [7] suggest, the most crucial parameters of the interference, namely channel occupancy degree (COD) and transmission rate of the interference could be practically measured by means of packet sniffers and looking up the radio tap header information of sniffed packets. Two dedicated monitoring agents are incorporated that are basically Wi-Fi interfaces operating on IEEE 802.11 monitor mode [19] on every of the channels in the vicinity of the SUT (see Fig.…”
Section: A Setup Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this condition, the dominant external parameters influencing the throughput of the SUT is the traffic characterization of the homogeneous collocated interference links. As authors in [7] suggest, the most crucial parameters of the interference, namely channel occupancy degree (COD) and transmission rate of the interference could be practically measured by means of packet sniffers and looking up the radio tap header information of sniffed packets. Two dedicated monitoring agents are incorporated that are basically Wi-Fi interfaces operating on IEEE 802.11 monitor mode [19] on every of the channels in the vicinity of the SUT (see Fig.…”
Section: A Setup Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The monitors are assumed to capture all present traffic without dropping any packets. If for any reason the interference is not perceived by the sniffers, an event detector as proposed in [7] could assist by detecting the unpredicted throughput degradation in the network. Secondly, deploying both the CDE and the REM imposes data and processing overhead on the network.…”
Section: Model Deploymentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…rule-based [2], case-based [3, 4, 5], search-based [6], knowledge-based [4] reasoning systems and many others. Such methods often require a certain set of representative cases or domain expert knowledge [7] to derive important analytical formulas or rules that steer the decision making process. The reader is referred to [1] for a detailed survey.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [4] the authors propose a framework, which utilizes radio environment maps to make informed decisions on the operating channel of the wireless network in response to performance degradation of the network due to the interference. However, the framework was verified in a controlled pseudo-shielded environment with a limited number of devices.…”
Section: Introduction: Background and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%