2019
DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/v3e42
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Cognitive Semantic Analysis of Meaning Interrelationship

Abstract: Expanding the English vocabulary for Iraqi second language (L2) learners is a challenging task. In the present work, Langacker’s cognitive linguistic theory of domains (1987) is adopted to provide a new sight into vocabulary learning, and to expand the vocabulary repertoire of Iraqi students. This paper aims at testing the validity of expanding the English vocabulary of L2 Iraqi learners throughout the theory of domains. It also tries to find how can domains theory increase the package of vocabulary for L2 l… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the primary source of difficulty regarding vocabulary acquisition throughout Langacker's theory has been treated. Lastly, the domains theory has proven its effectiveness in accurately comprehending the semantic domains of the English lexical concepts (Aajami, 2019).…”
Section: Understanding Semantics and Semantic Analysis Of Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the primary source of difficulty regarding vocabulary acquisition throughout Langacker's theory has been treated. Lastly, the domains theory has proven its effectiveness in accurately comprehending the semantic domains of the English lexical concepts (Aajami, 2019).…”
Section: Understanding Semantics and Semantic Analysis Of Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…e proposal delivering number of information is informed regarding the known class. e proposal of low shared information with the delivering term contains less power discrimination which must be ignored [41,42].…”
Section: Information Of Mutual Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%