2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2020.101823
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A coherent strategy for peak load shaving using energy storage systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A lower limit ( ) and a superior limit ( ) were also set, where it is desired that the energy demand of the grid remains. Such logic was based on a peak load shaving strategy [15].…”
Section: E Ess Control Modementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lower limit ( ) and a superior limit ( ) were also set, where it is desired that the energy demand of the grid remains. Such logic was based on a peak load shaving strategy [15].…”
Section: E Ess Control Modementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, sustainable operation recommends a broader perspective, balancing technical, technological, economic, environmental, institutional, social appraisals for optimum benefits for long-run sustainability [7]. Power systems reliability and stability of supply, security, flexibility, and proper operation owing optimum deployment of smart technologies and storage systems that make the possible increase in profitability, satisfaction in services delivery, and competitiveness in the market [8][9][10]. Managing supply and demand sides and propose a quick response to transient increases or decreases in power supply from alternating renewable sources, the different storage solutions may be hierarchies based on their ability, ensuring dynamic pricing structures are recommended [11].…”
Section: Energy Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Choosing the best combination of risk management techniques as part of a particular innovation project requires assessing a range of factors, such as the complexity and specificity of innovation activities and the level of profitability of the innovation at a given time. Time periods, insurance service costs, likelihood of risk, size and quality, predictability of risk, legal limits and provisions, and project implementation phases are several aspects that become primary considerations [36].…”
Section: Framework Designmentioning
confidence: 99%