“…Of the 40 publications included in this review, 33 were from Australia, five were from the US and two were from Canada (Table 2). Program evaluation was the most common study design (N=11), 3,7,9,23,24,[28][29][30][31][32][33] followed by descriptive reports (N=8), 5,15,22,25,[34][35][36][37] exploratory studies (N=4), [38][39][40][41] cohort studies (N=4), 6,26,27,42 cross-sectional studies (N=3) 27,[43][44][45] and feasibility studies (N=3) [46][47][48] ; the remaining studies used a variety of analytical techniques and study designs. The language used to define IHWs varied across the studies, with Aboriginal health worker or AHW being employed most frequently (N=14) 6,15,22,[25][26][27]29,32,33,38,39,43,<...…”