2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.09.601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Collaborative Architecture to support Circular Economy through Digital Material Passports and Internet of Materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Section 5 presents the environmental and technical data to be integrated into the DPP, building on the above-mentioned methodologies. These data serve to complement the initial research efforts conducted by the authors [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Section 5 presents the environmental and technical data to be integrated into the DPP, building on the above-mentioned methodologies. These data serve to complement the initial research efforts conducted by the authors [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Additionally, third-party organizations can utilize the DPP information to evaluate sustainability indices. Demonstrating a strong performance in this domain can translate into a competitive advantage [13].…”
Section: Expected Advantagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The designers should have the opportunity to select construction products basing on info about the "Circular Economy principles" such as design for disassembly, recycling, reuse, recovery, and remanufacturing. Digital material passports [15], standards concerning the communication of environmental impacts, namely the Environmental Product Declarations (EPD) [16], Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) [17] and so on, are some of the solutions proposed. However, every solution involves different methodologies and, as a result, "non-comparable" information is provided in the market.…”
Section: Civil Engineering Research Journalmentioning
confidence: 99%