2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A collaborative EDNAP exercise on SNaPshot™-based mtDNA control region typing

Abstract: A collaborative European DNA Profiling (EDNAP) Group exercise was undertaken to assess the performance of an earlier described SNaPshot™-based screening assay (denoted minimtSNaPshot) [1] that targets 18 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) positions in the mitochondrial (mt) DNA control region and allows for discrimination of major European mtDNA haplogroups. Besides the organising laboratory, 14 forensic genetics laboratories were involved in the analysis of 13 samples, which were centrally prepared and thor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The application of FDSTools is not limited to the analysis of STRs. FDSTools has already been applied successfully to the analysis of multiplex assays of SNP fragments (manuscript in preparation) and complete mtDNA data [31]. Note that the minimum number of required reference samples for loci other than STRs will depend on the amount of variation observed in these loci.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of FDSTools is not limited to the analysis of STRs. FDSTools has already been applied successfully to the analysis of multiplex assays of SNP fragments (manuscript in preparation) and complete mtDNA data [31]. Note that the minimum number of required reference samples for loci other than STRs will depend on the amount of variation observed in these loci.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While alignment software has simplified the analysis of MPS mtDNA profiles, sequence interpretation, especially heteroplasmy, can still be challenging and requires guidance and additional bioinformatic tools to ensure profiles are reported accurately (Just et al, 2014), including when assessing noise in MPS data (McElhoe, et al, 2020; Hoogenboom et al, 2017; Weiler et al, 2017).…”
Section: Massively Parallel Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%