A collective choice method based on individual preferences relational systems (p.r.s.)

Jabeur, Khaled; Martel, Jean‐Marc

doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.10.028

Cited by 21 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…According to the kernel definition, it is supposed including the ''best'' alternatives and those that are incomparable. However, the kernel can also contain bad alternatives (see example given by Jabeur and Martel [9]). In order to rectify this situation, Jabeur and Martel [9] propose in the third operation to purify, when it is possible, the kernel.…”

Section: Exploitation Of the Global Preference Relational Systemmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…However, the kernel can also contain bad alternatives (see example given by Jabeur and Martel [9]). In order to rectify this situation, Jabeur and Martel [9] propose in the third operation to purify, when it is possible, the kernel. In order to carry out this operation, he defines first the two following sets:…”

Section: Exploitation Of the Global Preference Relational Systemmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…These authors propose a detailed review of original procedures to exploit a p.r.s according to three decisional problematic: the choice problematic, the ranking problematic and the sorting problematic. For example, in the case of choice problematic, Jabeur and Martel [9] suggest mainly two exploitation procedures: (i) a procedure based on purified kernel concept and (ii) a procedure based on the alternative performance concept.…”

Section: Exploitation Of the Global Preference Relational Systemmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the literature, several exploitation procedures can be found. One can quote the works of Roy [18], Colson [4] and Jabeur and Martel [9] for the choice problematic; the works of Roy [19], Brans and Vincke [3], Colson [4] and Jabeur and Martel [10] for the ranking problematic; and the works of Yu [26] and Jabeur and Martel [11] for the sorting problematic.…”

Section: Aggregating Local Preference Relationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Multiple criteria aggregation procedure for mixed evaluations

Amor

Jabeur

Martel

2007

European Journal of Operational Research

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Exploitation Of the Global Preference Relational Systemmentioning

confidence: 98%

Section: Exploitation Of the Global Preference Relational Systemmentioning

confidence: 98%

Section: Exploitation Of the Global Preference Relational Systemmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Aggregating Local Preference Relationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Multiple criteria aggregation procedure for mixed evaluations

Amor

Jabeur

Martel

2007

European Journal of Operational Research

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…However, in PMCM, various techniques can be used to aggregate different perspectives to allow for a ranking of the alternatives which reflects both a compromise solution and a mediation of conflicting interests and values, instead of providing the optimal choice in relation to only one group or individual. On the application of these techniques from both a theoretical and empirical perspective see Saaty 1980, Jelassi et al 1990, Forman and Peniwati 1998, Mendoza and Martins 2006, Jabeur and Martel 2007, and Garmendia and Gamboa 2012, among others.…”

Section: Participatory Multicriteria Methods and Their Relevance For mentioning

confidence: 99%

Integrating adaptive governance and participatory multicriteria methods: a framework for climate adaptation governance

Munaretto

Siciliano²,

Turvani³

2014

E&S

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT. Climate adaptation is a dynamic social and institutional process where the governance dimension is receiving growing attention. Adaptive governance is an approach that promises to reduce uncertainty by improving the knowledge base for decision making. As uncertainty is an inherent feature of climate adaptation, adaptive governance seems to be a promising approach for improving climate adaptation governance. However, the adaptive governance literature has so far paid little attention to decisionmaking tools and methods, and the literature on the governance of adaptation is in its infancy in this regard. We argue that climate adaptation governance would benefit from systematic and yet flexible decision-making tools and methods such as participatory multicriteria methods for the evaluation of adaptation options, and that these methods can be linked to key adaptive governance principles. Moving from these premises, we propose a framework that integrates key adaptive governance features into participatory multicriteria methods for the governance of climate adaptation.

show abstract