2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2019.07.083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A collective filtering based content transmission scheme in edge of vehicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditional data sources are typically transferred remotely to the cloud center, and services that are based on the mobile cloud cannot guarantee the satisfaction of low-latency requirements for content transfer [52]. Therefore, mobile edge computing has the potential to overcome this challenge.…”
Section: A Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Traditional data sources are typically transferred remotely to the cloud center, and services that are based on the mobile cloud cannot guarantee the satisfaction of low-latency requirements for content transfer [52]. Therefore, mobile edge computing has the potential to overcome this challenge.…”
Section: A Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since edge servers are distributed in the surrounding area, fog computing is expected to improve the data transmission efficiency. Reference [52] proposed a vehicle edge collaborative filtering content transmission scheme that is based on fog calculation. A collective filtering algorithm and a two-dimensional Markov chain are used to combine positional awareness, content caching, and decentralized computing for content precaching at the edge of the vehicle network.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After making several improvements to these shortcomings, it was found that the security and various performances of the protocol were greatly improved [15]. Wang et al (2020) introduced the agent to the offloading of computing tasks, proposed a new drone-assisted mobile edge computing (MEC) framework, and used the intelligence and perception of the agent to build a system model. The simulation showed that introducing the agent could significantly reduce the delay and energy consumption.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulation showed that introducing the agent could significantly reduce the delay and energy consumption. Also, the effectiveness of the agent was explained [16].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it would be a much more feasible solution to deploy certain parts of a deep learning model to the IoT edge device in an effort to assist the cloud in the entire continuous learning process instead of relying completely on the cloud [19]. When a given deep learning model is trained in a distributed manner between two or more devices, this will present certain challenges such as deciding how many and which specific layers of a model must be run on the edge and the cloud (this is known as offloading [20][21][22][23]), dealing with the transmission load between the IoT edge device and the cloud [24] and evaluating whether it is important for the IoT edge device to transmit all of the data to the cloud for model training or whether some of the data be discarded [25]. These challenges have not yet been addressed in a distributed incremental learning scenario which is what this paper attempts to do.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%