2019
DOI: 10.1109/tkde.2018.2865785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Collective, Probabilistic Approach to Schema Mapping Using Diverse Noisy Evidence

Abstract: Abstract-We propose a probabilistic approach to the problem of schema mapping. Our approach is declarative, scalable, and extensible. It builds upon recent results in both schema mapping and probabilistic reasoning and contributes novel techniques in both fields. We introduce the problem of schema mapping selection, that is, choosing the best mapping from a space of potential mappings, given both metadata constraints and a data example. As selection has to reason holistically about the inputs and the dependenc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given our strong positive results, we believe our metrics should become an important feature that could be used in other problems that involve understanding or integrating tables. An important open problem is to extend DomainNet to collectively resolve ambiguous metadata and data, perhaps using probabilistic graphical models that have been applied to collectively resolving multiple types of entities at once [26] and to collectively resolving data and metadata inconsistency in schema mapping [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given our strong positive results, we believe our metrics should become an important feature that could be used in other problems that involve understanding or integrating tables. An important open problem is to extend DomainNet to collectively resolve ambiguous metadata and data, perhaps using probabilistic graphical models that have been applied to collectively resolving multiple types of entities at once [26] and to collectively resolving data and metadata inconsistency in schema mapping [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are currently extending Kensho in the spirit of the integration by example paradigm [78]. A large body of traditional data exchange literature is dedicated to identifying or exploiting examples that can shown to data engineers and incorporating their feedback [3,5,15,17,32,42,59,78]. Similarly, we are working on approaches for incorporating user feedback to improve upon our mapping rules.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are numerous prior-arts in schema matching [29], [38], [51], [72], which mainly match schemas based on metadata (e.g., attribute name) and/or instances. Entity matching (EM) [16], which is to identify data instances that refer to the same real-world entity, is also related.…”
Section: Schema/entity Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%