Site-directed spin-labeling electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy is a useful tool to obtain information about the environment of specific residues. One of its applications is to investigate membrane protein topology based on the accessibility of the spin label, with the assumption that the position of the spin label in the membrane is close to that of the native residue. This assumption is valid in proteins with well-ordered structures, but could be problematic in small peptides because the labeling may cause a perturbation that is large enough to change local interactions between the peptide and the membrane. To quantitatively characterize such effects, we have simulated the association of a 25-amino-acid peptide, MARCKS-ED, to membranes with and without spin labels. Our simulations show that the depths of spin labels are~6-17 Å deeper than the unlabeled charged and polar residues in the wild-type. When the hydrophobic residue Phe is labeled, however, the spin-label depth is close to that of the native residue as well as the experimental value. Our study suggests that one should be cautious in interpretation of spin label data when charged and polar residues in small peptides are labeled.Site-directed spin labeling in combination with electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy is a powerful technique to characterize protein structure and dynamics (1). Specifically, the power-saturation electron paramagnetic resonance experiment is able to determine the burial depth of a spin label in lipid bilayers, and provide valuable information about topology and structure of the membrane-associated protein and peptide (2). This method has been applied to MARCKS-ED, a 25-amino-acid peptide derived from the effector domain of myristoylated alanine-rich C kinase substrate protein (3,4). The peptide is enriched with basic and hydrophobic residues and is able to sequester anionic lipids through nonspecific electrostatic interactions (5,6). By individually labeling 12 selected residues with methanethiosulfonate spin labels (MTSSL) and measuring their immersion depth, Qin and Cafiso (4) proposed a model of MARCKS-ED on the membrane-solution interface, where the hydrophobic side chains are buried in the membrane and the N-terminus is exposed to aqueous phase.In our recent molecular dynamics simulation study (7), the association of wild-type (WT) MARCKS-ED with membranes was simulated using the highly mobile membrane-mimetic model (HMMM) (8), where the lipid tails were truncated and replaced with 1,1-dichloro-ethane (DCLE). Briefly, two MARCKS-ED peptides were placed 45 Å above and below the center of an HMMM membrane, and the system was simulated for 300 ns with five replicates. The simulations revealed a membrane-bound model that is overall similar to the one proposed by Qin and Cafiso (4), i.e., the hydrophobic residues are buried and both termini are exposed. However, the most notable difference between the simulation and the experimental results is that most residues are buried less deep in the simulation th...