“…Bioacoustic characters are useful to consider in systematic research across various animal groups, including birds, insects, mammals and amphibians (Alström & Ranft, 2003; Baptista & Kroodsma, 2001; Desutter‐Grandcolas & Robillard, 2003; López‐Baucells et al., 2018b; Philippe et al., 2017; Tishechkin & Vedenina, 2016). Even in the most well‐known animal class on Earth, namely birds, bioacoustic comparisons have helped uncover high levels of cryptic diversity, sometimes with valuable implications for conservation (Ford & Parker, 1973; Ford, 1983; Baptista & Kroodsma, 2001; Gwee et al., 2017, 2019a; Rheindt et al., 2008), and have been one of the driving forces behind a minor renaissance in genuine new species discovery in the 21st century (Alström et al., 2010; Krabbe et al., 2020; Prawiradilaga et al., 2018; Rheindt et al., 2020). At the same time, bioacoustic species delimitation is not a panacea as vocal divergence may be subtle or ambiguous in genetically differentiated cryptic species (Dufresnes et al., 2018; Garg et al., 2016; Harris et al., 2014).…”