2006
DOI: 10.1002/net.20102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A column generation approach for SONET ring assignment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another formulation of SRAP as a set‐partitioning model with additional knapsack constraints is given in Macambira et al. .…”
Section: Background Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another formulation of SRAP as a set‐partitioning model with additional knapsack constraints is given in Macambira et al. .…”
Section: Background Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GPCC problem has applications in the field of telecommunication network optimization, in particular it turns out to be a relevant model for optimum design of optical networks (see e.g. references [1,7,10]). In this application, the node set V corresponds to geographical sites and t (u,v) to the traffic demands between locations u and v. For various technological reasons, network operators often want to partition the node set V into clusters on which a certain network topology is imposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of the present paper is to investigate and compare several 0-1 integer linear programming models for GPCC which can be qualified as compact, i.e. featuring a polynomial number of variables and constraints (by contrast, the model underlying the column generation approach in [10] which is a large scale set partitioning model with exponentially many columns, is essentialy noncompact). Note that two main compact 0-1 models for graph partitioning, namely Node-Cluster models and Node-Node models, have been investigated in the litterature where binary variables represent respectively relations of membership between nodes and clusters (case of the Node-Cluster model) and relations between nodes belonging to a same cluster (case of the Node-Node model).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several techniques have been proposed to effectively solve integer linear programs that are plagued with symmetry. First, the problem may be reformulated, as possible, in a fashion that breaks the original symmetry (Fourer, 2000;Ghoniem and Sherali, 2010a); this often results in models that possess a very large number of columns and lend themselves to column generation approaches (Barnhart et al, 1998;Macambira and Maculan, 2006). A second approach that has gained popularity consists in enforcing tailored hierarchical constraints (Sherali and Smith, 2001), which ranks and imparts specific identities to indistinguishable model entities, thereby breaking symmetry and significantly enhancing algorithmic performance and problem solvability by reducing the search domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Sherali and Smith (2001) successfully employed this approach to a telecommunications network design problem (also see Macambira and Maculan (2006)), a noise pollution problem, and a machine procurement and operation problem. In addition, various symmetry-enhanced formulations for facility layout problems have been discussed by Sherali et al (2003), Meller et al (2007), and Konak et al (2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%