2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2018.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A combination of multi-fluid mixture models with COSMO-SAC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the data of Sage and Lacey 57 (red symbols), Fig. 5 shows a comparison of the GERG-2008 11 to more recent experimental data with small, wellcharacterized uncertainties from several authors [58][59][60][61][62][63] covering the same temperature, pressure, and composition ranges. These other data are consistent and are represented far more accurately than the data of Sage and Lacey.…”
Section: Data Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to the data of Sage and Lacey 57 (red symbols), Fig. 5 shows a comparison of the GERG-2008 11 to more recent experimental data with small, wellcharacterized uncertainties from several authors [58][59][60][61][62][63] covering the same temperature, pressure, and composition ranges. These other data are consistent and are represented far more accurately than the data of Sage and Lacey.…”
Section: Data Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Percentage deviations of experimental data for the binary system C1C2 of Sage and Lacey57 and other accurate data[58][59][60][61][62][63] from the GERG-2008 model. 11Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If accurate data are available, the empirical binary specific departure function α ij r can be fitted to the experimental data, see for example the mixture models for methane + ethane by Kunz and Wagner and for carbon dioxide + water by Gernert and Span . However, if no experimental data are available, no binary specific departure function can be developed and only standard mixing rules for the reducing functions can be applied, which do not necessarily yield good predictive results as demonstrated, for example, by Jäger et al , For screening purposes, a model with better predictive capabilities should be used.…”
Section: Combination Of the Multifluid Mixture Model With Cosmo-sacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jäger et al developed a theoretically based departure function, which allows for the combination of the multifluid mixture model with excess Gibbs energy models such as UNIFAC or COSMO-SAC. , The model reads R = 8.3144628 J mol –1 K –1 is the universal gas constant, g GE E,r is the residual excess Gibbs energy calculated from a g E -model, and b = ∑ i =1 N b i is the covolume of the Soave–Redlich–Kwong equation of state. The reduced density of the mixture δ ref at reference pressure p ref , see Jäger et al, is and the reduced density of component i at reference pressure becomes ρ i ,ref = is the density of the saturated liquid of pure component i at reference pressure p ref . The reference density ρ ref of the mixture can be obtained by assuming ideal mixing behavior The reducing temperature and the reducing density are obtained by linear mixing rules The residual excess Gibbs energy can be calculated from COSMO-SAC models in the following way with γ i ,S r being the residual activity coefficient of component i in a liquid mixture S.…”
Section: Combination Of the Multifluid Mixture Model With Cosmo-sacmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation