2014
DOI: 10.1017/s026505171400014x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A combination of one-to-one teaching and small group teaching in higher music education in Norway – a good model for teaching?

Abstract: Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S026505171400014XHow to cite this article: Bjørg Julsrud Bjøntegaard (2015). A combination of one-to-one teaching and small group teaching in higher music education in Norway -a good model for teaching?.B j ø r g J u l s r u d B j ø n t e g a a r d Accordingly, we can speak of two master-apprentice models:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
26

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
14
0
26
Order By: Relevance
“…When collaborative learning is used for music practice and performance, masters and apprentices become co-constructors of learning (Lave & Wenger, 1991;Lebler, 2007;Hanley, Baker, & Pavlidis, 2018). These informal group practices contrast with those of the conservatoire, where one-to-one tuition is the predominant educational model for music practice and performance (Bjøntegaard, 2015;Carey & Grant, 2015;Virkkula, 2016b;Gaunt, 2017). Informal pedagogies within communities of practice have much to recommend themselves in arts education (Virkkula, 2016a), and more specifically, it is argued in this paper, within HME (see also Westerlund & Partti, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When collaborative learning is used for music practice and performance, masters and apprentices become co-constructors of learning (Lave & Wenger, 1991;Lebler, 2007;Hanley, Baker, & Pavlidis, 2018). These informal group practices contrast with those of the conservatoire, where one-to-one tuition is the predominant educational model for music practice and performance (Bjøntegaard, 2015;Carey & Grant, 2015;Virkkula, 2016b;Gaunt, 2017). Informal pedagogies within communities of practice have much to recommend themselves in arts education (Virkkula, 2016a), and more specifically, it is argued in this paper, within HME (see also Westerlund & Partti, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A teacher will demonstrate how to perform a chord, the student will attempt to play according to the teacher's instructions, and the teacher will then provide feedback, showing the student how to correct their mistakes [9][10][11]. Two faults have been identified with this model: firstly, students can experience boredom as a result of playing too passive a role [12][13][14], and secondly, students can feel demotivated as a result of a dynamic that involves consistently finding fault and errors in their performance. Clearly, both of these faults act as obstacles when it comes to learning a musical instrument [15].Numerous studies have explored the relationship between musical instruments and their associations with a particular gender.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence also exists that students benefit from multiple voices in their principal study (Haddon, 2011) and from a variety of one-to-one, masterclass and collaborative small group learning opportunities (Bjøntegaard, 2015;Forbes, 2016).…”
Section: Reflections and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%