2001
DOI: 10.1006/eujc.2000.0459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Combinatorial Formula for the Linearization Coefficients of General Sheffer Polynomials

Abstract: We prove a formula for the linearization coefficients of the general Sheffer polynomials, which unifies all the special known results for Hermite, Charlier, Laguerre, Meixner and Meixner-Pollaczek polynomials. Furthermore, we give a new and explicit real version of the corresponding formula for Meixner-Pollaczek polynomials. Our proof is based on some explicit bijections and sign-reversing weight-preserving involutions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A typical question in this direction is to find explicitly the linearization coefficients R P n 1 (x)P n 2 (x) · · · P n k (x)dµ(x). (1.4) Already the proofs of the positivity of these coefficients are quite subtle [19] and they are known explicitly only in very rare cases [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A typical question in this direction is to find explicitly the linearization coefficients R P n 1 (x)P n 2 (x) · · · P n k (x)dµ(x). (1.4) Already the proofs of the positivity of these coefficients are quite subtle [19] and they are known explicitly only in very rare cases [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the β-extension of MacMahon's Master theorem is combined with the exponential formula [30,33], all the known combinatorial interpretations of the linearization coefficients of the orthogonal Sheffer polynomials can be deduced by computing their generating functions. Another way to gain insight into the combinatorial interpretation of the linearization coefficients is from their corresponding moment sequences, see [24,32,35], (1.8) µ n = R x n dµ(x).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several q-analogues of the recurrence relation (2) and moments (3) were investigated in the last two decades (see [2,18,19]) in order to obtain new mahonian statistics on the symmetric groups. On the other hand, in view of the unified combinatorial interpretations of several aspects of Sheffer orthogonal polynomials (moments, polynomials, and the linearization coefficients)(see [14,20,22]) it is natural to seek for a q-version of this picture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%