2016
DOI: 10.1080/13675567.2016.1164126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A combined approach using AHP and DEMATEL for evaluating success factors in implementation of green supply chain management in Indian manufacturing industries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
111
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
111
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Freeman, Tao, and Graham (2015) adopted an integrated AHP-Entropy-TOPSIS method for green supplier selection. Gandhi, Mangla, Kumar, and Kumar (2016) Although these hybrid methods can effectively solve complex supplier selection problems, the common defects of these approaches are that the evaluation criteria are not inclusive and the relationships among all the factors are unclear and obscure (Valmohammadi & Dashti, 2016). Considering the interdependencies among the criteria, we use TISM and the FANP method in our study to address the problem of socially responsible supplier evaluation and selection.…”
Section: Review Of Supplier Selection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Freeman, Tao, and Graham (2015) adopted an integrated AHP-Entropy-TOPSIS method for green supplier selection. Gandhi, Mangla, Kumar, and Kumar (2016) Although these hybrid methods can effectively solve complex supplier selection problems, the common defects of these approaches are that the evaluation criteria are not inclusive and the relationships among all the factors are unclear and obscure (Valmohammadi & Dashti, 2016). Considering the interdependencies among the criteria, we use TISM and the FANP method in our study to address the problem of socially responsible supplier evaluation and selection.…”
Section: Review Of Supplier Selection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Freeman, Tao, and Graham () adopted an integrated AHP–Entropy–TOPSIS method for green supplier selection. Gandhi, Mangla, Kumar, and Kumar () proposed a combined model using AHP and Decision‐Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory methods to evaluate the success factors in GSCM adoption. Awasthi and Kannan () introduced a nominal group technique and the VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje method to find the most appropriate supplier in a fuzzy environment.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study adopted the DEMATEL, which was proposed by Gabus and Fontela who were employed in the Battelle Memorial Institute of Geneva (Gabus and Fontela 1973; Fontela and Gabus 1976; Lee et al 2014a, b; Guo and Tsai 2015; Guo et al 2015; Gandhi et al 2016). At the initial stage, the DEMATEL was used to solve difficult and complex problems such as racial, hunger-related, environmental, and energy-related problems (Hu 2003; Huang 2013; Tsai and Xue 2013; Tsai et al 2014, 2015, 2016a; Qu et al 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, a combined AHP-DEMATEL technique is proposed to provide more robust results (Gandhi, Mangla, Kumar, & Kumar, 2016;Keshavarzfard & Makui, 2015). In this regard, it is not enough to use AHP for the calculation of criteria/subcriteria weights because it only comprises the linear dependence between decision elements from different hierarchy levels and does not consider feedback and dependence (Saaty, 2008).…”
Section: Phase 2: Global and Local Weights Of Criteria And Subcriteriamentioning
confidence: 99%