2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A combined GIS-MCDA approach to prioritize stream water quality interventions, based on the contamination risk and intervention complexity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 156 publications
(188 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem of understanding how multiple matrices (or levels) influence a certain activity has been analyzed in several studies using multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) techniques [22]. MCDA techniques are also used to evaluate spatially distributed data [23] and, especially in studies with a strong spatial component, in combination with GIS systems [24][25][26]. These approaches focus on a particular type of MCDA technique, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in a GIS environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of understanding how multiple matrices (or levels) influence a certain activity has been analyzed in several studies using multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) techniques [22]. MCDA techniques are also used to evaluate spatially distributed data [23] and, especially in studies with a strong spatial component, in combination with GIS systems [24][25][26]. These approaches focus on a particular type of MCDA technique, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in a GIS environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach allows different basins to be assess and prioritize based on multiple factors that are relevant to improve water quality, including point and diffuse pressures and landscape metrics. By applying this methodology, they can rank the basins that should be targeted for interventions to improve water quality and mitigate the risk of contamination (Fernandes et al, 2021). Likewise, the engagement of partners, even in the development of a sediment model, can be very important for decision-making, as those involved can have more transparency and understanding of the processes, thus generating more confidence in the results (Cho et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ullah and Zhang [51] employed it in conjunction with GIS in the hazard zoning of the Panjkora River basin, Pakistan (2020). Fernandes et al [52] used it in Portugal to support decision makers in water quality prioritization (2021). Kourgialas and Karatzas [53] used MCDA and artificial neural network techniques in flood hazard assessment in a GIS environment in Greece (2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%