2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2013.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A combined INS and DINS study of proton quantum dynamics of ice and water across the triple point and in the supercritical phase

Abstract: a b s t r a c tWe report new results of a combined analysis of previous Inelastic Neutron Scattering (INS) and Deep Inelastic Neutron Scattering (DINS) experiments on ice at T = 271 K and water at T = 285 K and T = 673 K. Proton quantum dynamics is discussed in terms of the total mean kinetic energy, hE K i, and its three principal direction components, hE K i a (with a ¼ x; y; z), the lineshape momentum distribution, n(p), and its harmonic lineshape components, n h (p). The results show that the single proto… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
43
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
6
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The σ α values reported in Table 1 unveil a main distinctive feature between SW and ice at T = 271 K: the anisotropy of the momentum distribution is slightly more pronounced in SW than in the solid phase. Similar features are also obtained in previous combined INS and DINS investigation in water at T=285 K and ice at T=271 K. 22 The difference in the two n(p) lineshapes, magnified by a factor ten, is untangled in the bottom panel of Figure 1. This shows the radial momentum distributions, 4π p 2 n(p), for SW and ice obtained using the M2 model.…”
Section: Toc Graphicsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The σ α values reported in Table 1 unveil a main distinctive feature between SW and ice at T = 271 K: the anisotropy of the momentum distribution is slightly more pronounced in SW than in the solid phase. Similar features are also obtained in previous combined INS and DINS investigation in water at T=285 K and ice at T=271 K. 22 The difference in the two n(p) lineshapes, magnified by a factor ten, is untangled in the bottom panel of Figure 1. This shows the radial momentum distributions, 4π p 2 n(p), for SW and ice obtained using the M2 model.…”
Section: Toc Graphicsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Dark-blue diamonds refer to data around density maximum [76]; dark blue squares at 271 and 300 K from ref. [77]; and dark-blue triangles refer to the present data.…”
Section: -6supporting
confidence: 54%
“…In the second parametric approach, one uses a model function for J(y,Q), i .e., a spherically averaged multivariate Gaussian [36,[58][59][60][61][62]. The basic assumption in this case is that the NMD of each individual particle is well approximated by a multivariate Gaussian distribution with three distinct frequencies ω x,y,z associated with local and orientationdependent principal axes of the molecule.…”
Section: Momentum Distributions and Mean Kinetic Energiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As far as water is concerned, DINS is currently a quantitative and well-established technique capable to get fresh insights into the intermolecular HB interactions at the heart of the peculiar properties of water, in many respects complementary to INS and optical spectroscopy [62,141]. The most significant results of these investigations are reviewed in the following sections.…”
Section: Water From the Bulk To The Nanoscalementioning
confidence: 99%