2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A combined method for state-of-charge estimation for lithium-ion batteries using a long short-term memory network and an adaptive cubature Kalman filter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 249 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimation results and error are shown in Fig. (12)(13)(14)(15). Due to external interference and temperature variation, the real rate of SOC presents a nonlinear and unstable trend.…”
Section: Verification With Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The estimation results and error are shown in Fig. (12)(13)(14)(15). Due to external interference and temperature variation, the real rate of SOC presents a nonlinear and unstable trend.…”
Section: Verification With Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, an accurate value of the initial SOC is difficult to obtain, and the degradation of 2017 1 battery performance affects the accurate estimation of SOC [12]. Physical model methods include the Kalman filter [13,14], sliding mode observer [15,16], and particle filter [17,18], among other methods. The Kalman filter is widely used, including, for example, the extended Kalman filter [19], unscented Kalman filter [20], and adaptive Kalman filter [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RLS algorithm based on minimum sum-squared error theory is a commonly used model parameter identification method widely applied in tracking of time-varying parameters [31]. To suppress the effect of data saturation in the identification of time-varying parameters with the RLS method, the RLS with forgetting factor (FFRLS) algorithm can be used in battery time-varying parameter identification [32].…”
Section: Model Parameters Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the identified ECM parameters, the SOC estimation under the 10 A discharge cycle is presented in Figure 10. As observed, the SOC reference with Arbin EVTS is formed with a black line; the red line and blue line represent the SOC Measurement data and model parameters Initial conditions equations (31) and (32) State prior estimation equation 33Gain matrix update equation 35State error covariance prior estimation equation 34PID coefficient update with gain equation 28State estimation measurement update by PID unit equation 36State error covariance update equation (37) Complexity 7 estimation with single AEKF and AEKF-PID, respectively. From the estimation results of two methods shown in Figure 10(a), these two SOC estimations can both track the SOC reference in a short period of time, no matter AEKF or AEKF-PID.…”
Section: Analysis Of Soc Estimation Under 10 a Dischargementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The challenge is, for example, to combine the difficult task of predicting production from renewable resources with consumption, where, according to Wang et al [24], the stability of the network can be ensured by using the LSTM module of interactive parallel prediction. Tian et al [31] dealt with the successful prediction of the model for optimizing the use of lithium-ion batteries in the field of energy, while Chatterjee and Dethlefs [32] focused on the failures and anomalies in the operation of wind turbines by means of LSTM. Hong et al [33] pointed to the stability and robustness of this method, as verified by extensive cross-validation and comparative analysis.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%