1986
DOI: 10.1016/0146-6380(86)90013-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A combined sedimentological and organic geochemical study of the Jurassic/Cretaceous Janusfjellet formation (Svalbard), Norway

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16B; Dypvik et al, 1991b). This interpretation is consistent with previous studies based on microfossils (Løfalidi & Thusu, 1976) and geochemistry (Dypvik, 1985;Hvoslef et al, 1986). Due to its shale-dominated character, extensive regional distribution (present in all investigated sections and wells; Fig.…”
Section: Palaeogeographic Development Of the Rurikfjellet Formationsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…16B; Dypvik et al, 1991b). This interpretation is consistent with previous studies based on microfossils (Løfalidi & Thusu, 1976) and geochemistry (Dypvik, 1985;Hvoslef et al, 1986). Due to its shale-dominated character, extensive regional distribution (present in all investigated sections and wells; Fig.…”
Section: Palaeogeographic Development Of the Rurikfjellet Formationsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…13) which suggest open-marine source rocks containing mixed Type II/III kerogen (Shanmugam, 1985). The interpreted palaeo-depositional setting corresponds to an anoxic marine shelf margin similar to that described by Hvoslef et al (1986), in which slight variations in distal/proximal locations, and proximity to palaeo-river input, control variation in the amount of Type II relative to Type III OM in the source rock.…”
Section: Inferred Source Rock Depositional Environment Data Insupporting
confidence: 54%
“…the low Pr/Ph ratio of sample SO-13) within the Group II petroleum can be explained by the variable nature of the organic matter within the Agardhfjellet Formation source rock, which ranges from Type II to Type III kerogen (Koevoets et al, 2016). This in turn indicates a range in depositional settings from restricted oxygendeficient to open marine (Hvoslef et al, 1986;Dypvik et al, 1991). Fig.…”
Section: Oil -Source Correlationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Interpretation: Hvoslef et al (1986), Koevoets et al (2016) and Abay et al (2017) showed that the paper shale in the Agardhfjellet Formation (F1) has a high HI index (236 mg HC/g organic C) and TOC values of up to 12.8%. This, together with the absent or sparse trace fossils and benthic invertebrate fossils, suggests anoxic sea-floor conditions.…”
Section: Facies and Facies Associationsmentioning
confidence: 99%