Sensory characteristics of 17 apple cultivars commonly grown in Finland were compared over three harvest years (2009)(2010)(2011). Descriptive analysis with a trained panel (n = 11-14) comprised 17 attributes rated from 0 ('not at all') to 10 ('very'): four appearance (green, red, area of red colour, skin waxiness), three odour (intense, grassy, fruity), five texture (hard, crispy, mealy, juicy, tough peel), and five flavour (intense, sour, sweet, astringent, diverse) attributes. Ratedintensities differed between the harvest years but their magnitude and direction of change varied according to the cultivar. Odour and flavour ratings tended to be higher in 2009 than in 2010 and 2011. The summer 2009 was fairly normal, while summer 2010 was hot and dry, and summer 2011 hot and humid. These climate may explain some of the differences between the first and the two subsequent years. Late season cultivars tended to be relatively stable against annual effects.Key words: apple, cultivar, descriptive analysis, sensory evaluation, harvest year
IntroductionThe cultivation of apples (Malus domestica Borkh) is increasing in Northern Europe, although the climate and high costs restrict production (Tahvonen 2007, Lehtonen 2015. In Finland, apple cultivation is important for rural economy. The annual crop has doubled since late 1990s, being now around 5 million kg (LUKE 2015a). Domestic apples are well liked and appreciated, because they are perceived as natural, fresh and clean, and have a low content of toxic residues (Malkki 2007, Seppä 2014.The grouping of domestic apple cultivars as summer, autumn and winter, or early, mid and late season cultivars, respectively, is based on the degree day (DD5), cumulative base temperature over 5 °C, requirements for harvest maturity (Tahvonen 2007, Kaukoranta et al. 2010. Early season cultivars are important in Finnish tradition, while late season cultivars are commercially more important, as they usually have longer storage life. Seppä et al. (2013a) showed that some late season cultivars maintain eating quality beyond the end of the harvest year even without controlled atmosphere storage.The global warming is already affecting plant phenology and cultivation, but effects differ depending on the plant and geographical area (Kaukoranta et al. 2010, Sugiura et al. 2013, Lehtonen 2015. With increasing level of DD5, the limit of commercial apple cultivation is moving northwards and the trend is estimated to continue (Kaukoranta et al. 2010, Finnish Meteorological Institute 2014. Domestic late season cultivars are likely to benefit the most. Currently, the level of DD5 reached in most years in southern Finland is between 1300 and 1400, but may be as high as 1600. The effects of climate change on harvest quality are hard to estimate, as the influence of non-climatic factors, such as horticultural and technological improvements can be substantial (Sugiura et al. 2013). For example, rootstock, training system and orchard density affect the availability of light and consequently, the rate of...