1985
DOI: 10.1107/s0108767385000411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comment on the calculation of rocking curves near the critical voltage in electron diffraction

Abstract: Several authors have reported the occurrence of a sharp peak doublet in certain rocking curves calculated for voltages near the critical voltage in electron diffraction. It is shown that such peaks are only artefacts due to the use of an approximation that becomes invalid under illumination conditions for which the main Bloch waves are nearly degenerate.0108-7673/85/020204-03501.50

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1986
1986
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Humphreys, 1979) that the excitation coefficients c i of the different Bloch waves in the crystal can be written c i= C~* as assumed in the text [equation (1)]. However, when absorption is taken into account by adding a small imaginary term iU'(r), the standard treatment no longer holds (David, Gevers & Stumpp, 1985). Since the nonHermitian part of the potential is purely imaginary, we must have U~* = U'g and therefore for the complex potential (Ug+iU'g)~(U_g+iU'_g)*.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Humphreys, 1979) that the excitation coefficients c i of the different Bloch waves in the crystal can be written c i= C~* as assumed in the text [equation (1)]. However, when absorption is taken into account by adding a small imaginary term iU'(r), the standard treatment no longer holds (David, Gevers & Stumpp, 1985). Since the nonHermitian part of the potential is purely imaginary, we must have U~* = U'g and therefore for the complex potential (Ug+iU'g)~(U_g+iU'_g)*.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%