“…Arguments Used for Restricting International Real Property Transactions: Case Study of Latvia), are as follows: threat to national security (Vrountas, 1990;Hodgson, Cullinan, & Campbell, 1999;Gugushvili, 2016), protection of national resources (Lazarus, 1987;Hodgson et al, 1999;Wilson, 2012), threat to national ____________________________________________________________________________ 2017 / 5 249 sovereignty (Vrountas, 1990;Tirres, 2013;Qin, 2015), anti-immigration policy (Lazarus, 1987;Hodgson et al, 1999;Qin, 2015;Gugushvili, 2016), national and cultural identity protection (Vrountas, 1990;Hodgson et al, 1999;Wood, 2004;Gugushvili, 2016), nationalistic sentiment (Hodgson et al, 1999;Vrountas, 1990;Gugushvili, 2016), xenophobia and sentiment against foreigners (Lazarus, 1987;Wood, 2004;Tirres, 2013), prevention of land speculation (Lazarus, 1987;Vrountas, 1990;Hodgson et al, 1999), prevention of land price increase (Lazarus, 1987;Vrountas, 1990;Fairbairn, 2015), ethnic argument (Lazarus, 1987;Wood, 2004;Tirres, 2013), protection of native farmers (Lazarus, 1987;Tirres, 2013), and questionable allegiance (Lazarus, 1987;Tirres, 2013;Qin, 2015). Thus, the number of applied arguments to limit international real property transact...…”