2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A common neural scale for the subjective pleasantness of different primary rewards

Abstract: A common neural scale for the subjective pleasantness of different primary rewards, NeuroImage (2010),

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(92 reference statements)
2
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This, together with manipulation of both reward type and interest rate, allowed us to identify neural planning signals related to behaviorally well-characterized subjective valuations. Although valuations for different reward types typically involve overlapping neural circuits [47, 48], future studies will have to confirm planning signals in saving behavior toward abstract, monetary rewards.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This, together with manipulation of both reward type and interest rate, allowed us to identify neural planning signals related to behaviorally well-characterized subjective valuations. Although valuations for different reward types typically involve overlapping neural circuits [47, 48], future studies will have to confirm planning signals in saving behavior toward abstract, monetary rewards.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, although stimulus saliency may be involved in the activation of some areas (e.g., insula, amygdala; Menon and Uddin, 2010), it may not be specific to aversive-related processing. For instance, saliency may also be central in reward-related processing in order to help detect potentially valuable, and thus rewarding, stimuli (see for instance Zink et al, 2004; Grabenhorst et al, 2010). Furthermore, this raises the question regarding the relationship between reward and aversion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate whether these independently represented specific reward representations are on a common scale of reward value, we performed an fMRI study in which we were able to show that even fundamentally different primary rewards, taste in the mouth and warmth on the hand, produced activations in the human orbitofrontal cortex that were scaled to the same range as evaluated by reports made during the neuroimaging of the subjective pleasantness of the set of stimuli (Grabenhorst et al, 2010a) (Fig. 11).…”
Section: The Neuroeconomics Of Reward Value In the Orbitofrontal Cortexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The regression lines describing the relationship between neural activity (% BOLD signal change) and subjective pleasantness ratings were indistinguishable for both types of reward. Reprinted from Grabenhorst et al (2010a), with permission from Elsevier.…”
Section: The Amygdalamentioning
confidence: 99%