Purpose of ReviewTo assess the effectiveness and harms of opioid therapy for chronic noncancer pain, alternative opioid dosing strategies, and risk mitigation strategies
Key Messages• Opioids are associated with small improvements versus placebo in pain and function, and increased risk of harms at short-term (1 to <6 months) followup; evidence on long-term effectiveness is very limited, and there is evidence of increased risk of serious harms that appear to be dose dependent. • At short-term followup, evidence showed no differences between opioids versus nonopioid medications in improvement in pain, function, mental health status, sleep, or depression. • Evidence on the effectiveness and harms of alternative opioid dosing strategies and the effects of risk mitigation strategies is lacking, although provision of naloxone to patients might reduce the likelihood of opioid-related emergency department visits, a taper support intervention might improve functional outcomes compared to no taper support, and co-prescription of benzodiazepines and gabapentinoids might increase risk of overdose. • No instrument has been shown to be associated with high accuracy for predicting opioid overdose, addiction, abuse, or misuse. iii This report is based on research conducted by the Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) under contract to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Rockville, MD (Contract No. 290-2015-00009-I). The findings and conclusions in this document are those of the authors, who are responsible for its contents; the findings and conclusions do not necessarily represent the views of AHRQ. Therefore, no statement in this report should be construed as an official position of AHRQ or of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.