“…The model returns a critical proximity threshold necessary for the very survival of economic dynamics, which, therefore, unlike neoclassical thought, does not perform, in such cases, any redistributive function. If the system, even in the presence of hypotheses that approach the perfect competition, manages to develop a macroscopic phase, for values of b max higher than the threshold region, in which, as the iterations proceed, an ever greater number of agents remains excluded from the transactions, and the system becomes more and more unequal, it is expected that such behaviors will be strengthened if conditions closer to reality are introduced, in the absence of strategically targeted corrective welfare policies-for example, introducing hypotheses of market power, asymmetric information, interactions between first-neighbors, or taking into account that economic inequalities are strongly correlated and mutually amplified by social inequalities [7], recognition inequalities [11], and the level of people's capabilities [12,26]. The simulations developed in this work may allow for studying how the initial stocks are correlated with the dynamics of the flows, and clearly highlighting how policy aimed at preventing, and/or re-activating and freeing the socio-economic trajectories of territories and communities at risk of falling and/or which have fallen below the poverty trap line, must be able to redistribute wealth.…”