A compact deep learning model for Khmer handwritten text recognition

Abstract

<p>The motivation of this study is to develop a compact offline recognition model for Khmer handwritten text that would be successfully applied under limited access to high-performance computational hardware. Such a task aims to ease the ad-hoc digitization of vast handwritten archives in many spheres. Data collected for previous experiments were used in this work. The oneagainst-all classification was completed with state-of-the-art techniques. A compact deep learning model (2+1CNN), with two convolutional layers and one fully connected layer, was proposed. The recognition rate came out to be within 93-98%. The compact model is performed on par with the state-of-theart models. It was discovered that computational capacity requirements usually associated with deep learning can be alleviated, therefore allowing applications under limited computational power.</p>

An optimization clustering and classification based on artificial intelligence approach for internet of things in agriculture

“…AI technology works in between automated and intelligence system, it is crucial that the data obtained must be analyzed with the appropriate data classification, data types, and the relationship of the information from big data to use this analysis to decide instead of using human judgement to decide. This type of classification is suitable to create predictive modeling called supervised learning [4]. This type of classification of the data is to create model in grouping the data into assigned groups by create sample groups with data in advance and predict the data groups that have not been classified.…”

Improved Javanese script recognition using custom model of convolution neural network

“…Various research on handwriting recognition of non-Latin characters has been more advanced. They use DL with more classes and more complex processes with better accuracy, such as Bangla [7], Kannada [20], Tifinagh [6], Arabic [14], [25], and Khmer [26] characters as shown in Table 1. While in research [9], [13], [22], [24], those who have used DL get an accuracy of only about 64% in [13], about 84% in [24], about 86% in [22] and the best in [9] in 94%.…”