2007
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A compact mean-variance-skewness model for large-scale portfolio optimization and its application to the NYSE market

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different risk measures providing a finer characterization of investment risk, beyond the MV perspective that relies solely on the variance of returns. Over the years, different risk measures have been introduced focusing on a more detailed description of the returns distribution with higherorder moments (skewness and kurtosis; Jondeau & Rockinger, 2006;Ryoo, 2007), tail-risk measures (value-at-risk, conditional value-at-risk; Jorion, 2009;Rockafellar & Uryasev, 2002), and other risk-return performance measures (e.g., omega ratio; Kapsos, Christofides, & Rustem, 2014). Cardinality constrained asset allocation, involving portfolios consisting of a fixed maximum number of assets selected automatically through an optimization model from a given pool of options (Bertsimas & Shioda, 2009;Chang, Meade, Beasley, & Sharaiha, 2000;Woodside-Oriakhi, Lucas, & Beasley, 2011).…”
Section: Capital Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different risk measures providing a finer characterization of investment risk, beyond the MV perspective that relies solely on the variance of returns. Over the years, different risk measures have been introduced focusing on a more detailed description of the returns distribution with higherorder moments (skewness and kurtosis; Jondeau & Rockinger, 2006;Ryoo, 2007), tail-risk measures (value-at-risk, conditional value-at-risk; Jorion, 2009;Rockafellar & Uryasev, 2002), and other risk-return performance measures (e.g., omega ratio; Kapsos, Christofides, & Rustem, 2014). Cardinality constrained asset allocation, involving portfolios consisting of a fixed maximum number of assets selected automatically through an optimization model from a given pool of options (Bertsimas & Shioda, 2009;Chang, Meade, Beasley, & Sharaiha, 2000;Woodside-Oriakhi, Lucas, & Beasley, 2011).…”
Section: Capital Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After obtaining a starting point, the method involved using a steepest descent algorithm and a variable metric algorithm to obtain an optimal solution. The incorporation of a third moment of R, the skewness, as seen in [124] reduces the number of variables considerably and the resulting model can be used to solve large scale problems. An active set method is proposed [135] to solve large scale versions of (3.3).…”
Section: Mean-variance Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Chen et al (2009), suggest that as the model utilises standard deviation to measure risks, both positive and negative risks are in fact employed as variables, while in reality, investors only tend to focus on negative risks. Other critics of the model include Ryoo (2007), who argues that the MV model is limited primarily by its inability to:…”
Section: Literature Review 21 Model Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%