2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00526-021-01983-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A compactness result for scalar-flat metrics on low dimensional manifolds with umbilic boundary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In both classical and boundary Yamabe problems, as a corollary of the compactness of solutions, people get that the problem is also stable for perturbation from below of the critical exponent. So stability is proved for scalar flat manifolds in [22], for manifolds with non umbilic boundary in [3,32], and for umbilic boundary manifolds whose Weyl tensor never vanishes on ∂M in [23,24]. On the other hand, in the present paper (and in [26] for umbilic boundary manifolds) we prove that Yamabe boundary problem is unstable with respect of perturbation form above of the critical exponent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In both classical and boundary Yamabe problems, as a corollary of the compactness of solutions, people get that the problem is also stable for perturbation from below of the critical exponent. So stability is proved for scalar flat manifolds in [22], for manifolds with non umbilic boundary in [3,32], and for umbilic boundary manifolds whose Weyl tensor never vanishes on ∂M in [23,24]. On the other hand, in the present paper (and in [26] for umbilic boundary manifolds) we prove that Yamabe boundary problem is unstable with respect of perturbation form above of the critical exponent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…, n, obtaining that Wλ √ ε,q + λ√ εV λ √ ε,q + φ λ √ ε,q solves also (26), and so the proof is complete Proof of Theorem 1. By our assumption on the second fundamental form and by (24), we have that the function ϕ(q) defined in Proposition 7 is strictly negative on ∂M . We recall as well, that the number C defined in the same proposition is positive.…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Very recently, compactness has been proved by the authors in [15] for manifold with umbilic boundary when n > 8 and the Weyl tensor of M is everywhere non zero on the boundary ∂M . In [17] the authors extend the compactness result to manifold of dimension n = 6, 7, 8, when the boundary is umbilic and the Weyl tensor of M is everywhere non zero on ∂M .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…An improvement of the estimate ( 20) is performed in [17], where the authors give a more precise description of the function v q as a sum of an harmonic function with explicit rational functions. This description, for n = 8, leads to the inequality, proved in [17, Lemma 19],…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%