2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11664-020-08422-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparasion of Photocatalytic Activity Between FeS2, Ni-Doped FeS2 Nanoparticles and Un-Doped FeS2/rGO Composite

Abstract: Un-doped and Ni-doped FeS 2 nanoparticles (NPs) with a doping concentration of 4.0 at.% have been synthesized by a solvothermal method. The obtained materials have been characterized by means of XRD, SEM, BET, Raman and UV-VIS spectroscopy. The photocatalytic activity has been evaluated based on degrading methylene blue with thin films of the NPs under UV-VIS light irradiation. An important observation was that the activity increases in the sequence FeS 2 NPs fi Ni-doped FeS 2 NPs fi composite of FeS 2 NPs/rGO… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high specific surface area of 80 m 2 g –1 obtained from BET (Brunauer–Emmett–Teller) analysis further demonstrates the assembled, nanostructured morphology of synthesized Ni 2 FeS 4 nanosheets resulting in voids between the sheets. The specific surface area is quite remarkable for a Ni–Fe–S material with a high density of 4.65 cm 3 g –1 , which is underlined by the comparison with Ni 0.7 Fe 0.3 S 2 microflowers (11 m 2 g –1 ) and Ni-doped FeS 2 nanoparticles (26 m 2 g –1 ) …”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The high specific surface area of 80 m 2 g –1 obtained from BET (Brunauer–Emmett–Teller) analysis further demonstrates the assembled, nanostructured morphology of synthesized Ni 2 FeS 4 nanosheets resulting in voids between the sheets. The specific surface area is quite remarkable for a Ni–Fe–S material with a high density of 4.65 cm 3 g –1 , which is underlined by the comparison with Ni 0.7 Fe 0.3 S 2 microflowers (11 m 2 g –1 ) and Ni-doped FeS 2 nanoparticles (26 m 2 g –1 ) …”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The specific surface area is quite remarkable for a Ni−Fe−S material with a high density of 4.65 cm 3 g −1 , which is underlined by the comparison with Ni 0.7 Fe 0.3 S 2 microflowers (11 m 2 g −1 ) 21 and Ni-doped FeS 2 nanoparticles (26 m 2 g −1 ). 22 These are very important features since the performance of an electrocatalyst can be controlled by tuning size, composition, morphology, and architecture of applied materials. 23 Nanostructuring can be beneficial, as it increases the volume to bulk ratio and thus the number of active surface sites.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 Furthermore, the peaks near 376 and 465 cm −1 could be ascribed to the in-phase stretching vibration of the S–S pair in CoS 2 , FeS 2 , and Ni 7 S 6 respectively. 32–34…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…vibration of the S-S pair in CoS 2 , FeS 2 , and Ni 7 S 6 respectively. [32][33][34] EPR measurements were employed to investigate the sulfur vacancy concentration. The distinct EPR signal peak located at g = 2.004 (Fig.…”
Section: Dalton Transactions Papermentioning
confidence: 99%