Anais De XXXV Simpósio Brasileiro De Telecomunicações E Processamento De Sinais 2017
DOI: 10.14209/sbrt.2017.115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative analysis about similarity search strategies for digital forensics investigations

Abstract: Known File Filtering method separates relevant from non-relevant information in forensics investigations using white or black lists. Due to limitations on hash functions (inability to detect similar data), approximate matching tools have gained focus recently. However, comparing two sets of approximate matching digests using brute force can be too time-consuming. Strategies to efficiently perform lookups in digests databases have been proposed as a form of similarity search. In this paper, we compare some stra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These new methods referred as similarity digest search strategies, aim at performing digest lookups very efficiently for KFF. This paper extends the work done in [Moia and Henriques 2017], where the authors performed the analysis of three different strategies (F2S2, MRSH-NET, and BF-based Tree) regarding three main aspects: precision, memory requirement, and lookup complexity. We show how the same strategies carry out the search and develop equations to estimate their operational costs, allowing a more precise time comparison.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These new methods referred as similarity digest search strategies, aim at performing digest lookups very efficiently for KFF. This paper extends the work done in [Moia and Henriques 2017], where the authors performed the analysis of three different strategies (F2S2, MRSH-NET, and BF-based Tree) regarding three main aspects: precision, memory requirement, and lookup complexity. We show how the same strategies carry out the search and develop equations to estimate their operational costs, allowing a more precise time comparison.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Another important fact to mention is that even though F2S2 presents higher lookup complexity than MRSH-NET and BF-based tree [Moia and Henriques 2017], it performed better in our experiments when comparing large data sets. As expected, MRSH-NET was better than the BF-based tree.…”
Section: Operational Costs Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moia and Henriques [17] have presented steps for developing new approximate matching functions. Approximate matching functions overcome the limitations of cryptographic hash functions that cannot detect non-identical, but similar, data.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%