2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-70438-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative analysis of artificial neural networks and wavelet hybrid approaches to long-term toxic heavy metal prediction

Abstract: the occurrence of toxic metals in the aquatic environment is as caused by a variety of contaminations which makes difficulty in the concentration prediction. In this study, conventional methods of backpropagation neural network (Bpnn) and nonlinear autoregressive network with exogenous inputs (NARX) were applied as benchmark models. Explanatory variables of Fe, pH, electrical conductivity, water temperature, river flow, nitrate nitrogen, and dissolved oxygen were used as different input combinations to forecas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alvarez-Guerra et al (Chan et al 2021) studied the use of traditional statistical methods in prediction of amphipod toxicity in contaminated sediments and reported machine learning methods have achieved significantly higher prediction accuracy compared to any of the statistical methods. Li et al 2020 studied the use of nonlinear autoregressive exogenous model (NARX) in predicting concentrations of three toxic metals in the Elbe river in Europe and demonstrated it was inferior to other statistical methods. Cipullo et al (2019) presented the research work of predicting the bioavailable concentration of chemicals in soil samples with a better prediction performance using random forest (RF) method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Alvarez-Guerra et al (Chan et al 2021) studied the use of traditional statistical methods in prediction of amphipod toxicity in contaminated sediments and reported machine learning methods have achieved significantly higher prediction accuracy compared to any of the statistical methods. Li et al 2020 studied the use of nonlinear autoregressive exogenous model (NARX) in predicting concentrations of three toxic metals in the Elbe river in Europe and demonstrated it was inferior to other statistical methods. Cipullo et al (2019) presented the research work of predicting the bioavailable concentration of chemicals in soil samples with a better prediction performance using random forest (RF) method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among machine learning methods, artificial neural networks (ANNs) and support vector machines (SVMs) has been found widely used in prediction of chemical components. Counter-propagation artificial neural networks (CP-ANN) in (Chan et al 2021), back-propagation neural networks (BPNN) in (Li et al 2020) and deep neural network (DNN) in (Chan et al 2021) were found to have excellent performance and superior to those from traditional statistical methods. Even traditional neural networks (NNs) in (Park et al 2014;Cipullo et al 2019;Chou et al 2018) are also shown good performance in prediction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…WNN can achieve convergence despite the divergence effect of multiple inputs. In such, the activation function retains its sensitivity to predict extreme values and display better adjustments [124]. Subsequently, wavelet decomposition poses extraction properties of the input's division signals bringing positive effect for heavy metal content prediction.…”
Section: ) Heavy Metal Prediction Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supervised learning is commonly used for classification and regression, where using data as a sample after trained by machine learning model which have the same target values [21]. From the theory of machine learning as well as its advantages, there are several implements in aquaculture recently such as biomass fish detection [22], size estimates [23][24][25], weight estimates [26][27][28], count [29][30][31][32], fish recognition [33][34][35][36][37][38], age detection [39,40], sex identification [34,[41][42][43], fish species classification [44][45][46][47][48][49][50], feeding behavior [51,52], group behavior [53], abnormal behavior [54,55], univariate prediction [38,[56][57][58][59], multivariate prediction [60][61][62], with the high accuracy rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%