2016 IEEE 1st International Conference on Power Electronics, Intelligent Control and Energy Systems (ICPEICES) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icpeices.2016.7853567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative analysis of classical three phase multilevel (five level) inverter topologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the last few decades, multilevel inverters became an appealing choice for electrical engineers in high power industrial AC applications due to its superior flexibility in output voltage and frequency, reduced filter requirements, lower dv/dt and lower switching losses with higher quality voltage and current waveforms than the standard two-level inverter [1].Various topologies have been proposed by researchers throughout the years appropriate for different applications such as photovoltaic systems, flexible AC transmission systems (FACTS) devices, drive systems, etc [2]. Three types of these topologies were considered as conventional topologies which are cascade H-bridge (CHB) MLI, neutral point clamped (NPC) MLI and flying capacitors (FC) MLI [3], [4]. These topologies were commercialized and used in different industrial and power system applications, and it created a challenging race to invent new topologies and control schemes and to implement the most advanced control strategies in MLI to produce ultimate inverters for specific applications [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last few decades, multilevel inverters became an appealing choice for electrical engineers in high power industrial AC applications due to its superior flexibility in output voltage and frequency, reduced filter requirements, lower dv/dt and lower switching losses with higher quality voltage and current waveforms than the standard two-level inverter [1].Various topologies have been proposed by researchers throughout the years appropriate for different applications such as photovoltaic systems, flexible AC transmission systems (FACTS) devices, drive systems, etc [2]. Three types of these topologies were considered as conventional topologies which are cascade H-bridge (CHB) MLI, neutral point clamped (NPC) MLI and flying capacitors (FC) MLI [3], [4]. These topologies were commercialized and used in different industrial and power system applications, and it created a challenging race to invent new topologies and control schemes and to implement the most advanced control strategies in MLI to produce ultimate inverters for specific applications [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three multilevel topologies are considered conventional topologies: diode clamped multilevel converter, flying capacitor multilevel converter, and cascade H-bridge converter. The conventional five-level topologies are compared in [9]. Each topology suffers from its limitation; the cascade H-bridge requires isolated DC sources that may not be available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, researchers have been paying increasingly attentions to multi-level inverters [1], which have a lot of merits. Owing to relatively low total harmonic distortion (THD) and the voltage stress on power devices [2], [3], multi-level inverters are very popular in many fields, such as motor drives [4], [5]. The neutral point clamped 3-level inverter (NPC 3LI) is widely applied among all multi-level topologies, because the hardware circuit is simple and only one dc-voltage source is needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%