2007
DOI: 10.1109/ijcnn.2007.4371032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Analysis of Feature Selection Methods for Ensembles with Different Combination Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It finds its applications in various areas not limited to signal processing, statistics, classification techniques suggested by Zheng et al (2004) and clustering techniques, machine learning as discussed by Canuto et al (2006). Of late in machine learning, feature selection with ensembles described by Santana et al (2007), Caragea et al (2003) is gaining high attention. Feature selection methods reduce the training time significantly.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It finds its applications in various areas not limited to signal processing, statistics, classification techniques suggested by Zheng et al (2004) and clustering techniques, machine learning as discussed by Canuto et al (2006). Of late in machine learning, feature selection with ensembles described by Santana et al (2007), Caragea et al (2003) is gaining high attention. Feature selection methods reduce the training time significantly.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many of the previous works, the researchers used single classifiers for the pattern recognition problem. Santana et al (2007) had used six different feature selections over six different methods to carry out their experiment. They had used ensembles of classifiers such as those provided in the literature of Ho (1998), Rodriguez et al (2006) and Tumer and Oza (2003).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several feature selection methods that can be used for ensembles, which can be broadly divided into two main approaches, which are: filter and wrapper. In the filter approach, as it can be found in [6], [7], [8], no need for a classification method to be used during the feature selection process. In other words, the feature selection process is independent from the classification method.…”
Section: Feature Selection In Ensemblesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the ensemble systems using feature selection (original and proposed), two criteria were used as basis (first ranking) for the ranking of the attributes, Spearman Correlation and Variance. The idea of using Spearman Correlation is to have a rank-based correlation measure, while the use of variance is because it is a criterion that does not need the class label vector to calculate its ranking [8].…”
Section: Experimental Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, according to the statistics, aiming at the problem of solving linear programming, the scholars has proposed more than one thousand kinds of algorithm! Although they belong to three different algorithms faction [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] --simplex method, ellipse method and interior point method, there is a common characteristic --geometric meaning is not obvious, that is to say, the existing algorithm does not make full use of the geometrical property of the linear programming model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%