2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative analysis of forest cover and catchment water yield relationships in northern China

Abstract: a b s t r a c tDuring the past few decades, China has implemented several large-scale forestation programs that have increased forest cover from 16.0% in the 1980s to 20.4% in 2009. In northern China, water is the most sensitive and limiting ecological factor. Understanding the dynamic interactions between forest ecosystems and water in different regions is essential for maximizing forest ecosystem services. We examined forest cover and runoff relationships in northern China using published data from a variety… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
73
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In humid regions (P/PET41) where PET plays a dominant role in water yield or evapotranspiration, a decrease in PET will likely cause a significant increase in water yield. This is consistent with the findings that afforestation can increase water yield in large watersheds of humid regions 11,12 because afforestation cools local land surface temperature 39 and thus decreases PET.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In humid regions (P/PET41) where PET plays a dominant role in water yield or evapotranspiration, a decrease in PET will likely cause a significant increase in water yield. This is consistent with the findings that afforestation can increase water yield in large watersheds of humid regions 11,12 because afforestation cools local land surface temperature 39 and thus decreases PET.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Several reviews of these experiences involving more than 250 PWEs from around the globe have reported that, although forest changes significantly affect the water yield [3][4][5] , the magnitude of any change varies greatly from one watershed to another 6,7 . Some studies, especially in large watersheds, found that forest changes have limited effects 8 , no effects 9,10 or even positive effects 11,12 on water yield. These highly variable and apparently inconsistent results have led to debates in both research and resource management communities, especially when another catastrophic flood or drought occurs somewhere in the world 13 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Re-vegetation can result in the increase of vegetation cover (Xin et al, 2008), improvement of soil nutrient levels (Zhou et al, 2008) and recovery of soil physical properties (Vallauri et al, 2002). However, re-vegetation also aggravated water scarcity (Wang et al, 2011a), which was one of the most prominent issues related to sustainable development. Addressing the trade-offs among water availability, grain production and carbon sequestration is the basis for ensuring the sustainable provision of ecosystem services in the Loess Plateau and requires a detailed understanding of the eco-hydrological processes involved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sun et al (2006) suggests that the average water yield reduction may vary from about 50 mm/yr (50%) in the semi-arid Loess Plateau region in northern China to about 300 mm/yr (30%) in the tropical southern region. Wang et al (2011a) using a variety of published data showed there is a positive relationship between forest cover and the runoff coefficient (r = 0.77, p < 0.05) in Northeast China. However, contradictory reports on the impact of forest on water yield also exist.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%