2005
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2005.846874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative analysis of image fusion methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 678 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 4 Taking the original multi-spectral image as a reference image, an objective quantitative analysis of the fused images was performed in the scale of degradation. Deviation index, correlation coefficient, entropy and relative dimensionless global error (ERGAS) ( Zhijun et al, 2005) were calculated, shown in Table 1. Comparing the results of Table1, the deviation index of the improved method is the smallest, and its correlation coefficient is the biggest, even it has the minimum ERGAS values.…”
Section: Experimental Experimental Experimental Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 4 Taking the original multi-spectral image as a reference image, an objective quantitative analysis of the fused images was performed in the scale of degradation. Deviation index, correlation coefficient, entropy and relative dimensionless global error (ERGAS) ( Zhijun et al, 2005) were calculated, shown in Table 1. Comparing the results of Table1, the deviation index of the improved method is the smallest, and its correlation coefficient is the biggest, even it has the minimum ERGAS values.…”
Section: Experimental Experimental Experimental Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 12 shows that barrel correction significantly improves the image segmentation accuracy when the observation radius continues to expand [55]. For small observation radius, pincushion correction leads to slight improvement of the image segmentation accuracy [56], but a significant improvement in accuracy occurs for a larger observation radius. We thus conclude that the main factor leading to the decrease in accuracy is the edge barrel distortion when the segmentation area increases [57].…”
Section: Accuracy Analysis Of Manual Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several image fusion methods have been devised and applied to various applications. The common methods used for fusion are principal component analysis (PCA) [Lal and Margret, 2015a], intensity hue saturation (IHS), wavelet transform (WT) [Lal and Margret, 2015a], Laplacian pyramid (LP), Bayesian, Brovey transform (BT), and maximum entropy [Wang et al, 2005]. Sparse representation was first introduced in image fusion by Yang and Shutao [2010], and since then, it has become a renowned image fusion technique amongst all other techniques.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%