2014
DOI: 10.1186/2193-8636-1-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative analysis of machine learning methods for classification type decision problems in healthcare

Abstract: Advanced analytical techniques are gaining popularity in addressing complex classification type decision problems in many fields including healthcare and medicine. In this exemplary study, using digitized signal data, we developed predictive models employing three machine learning methods to diagnose an asthma patient based solely on the sounds acquired from the chest of the patient in a clinical laboratory. Although, the performances varied slightly, ensemble models (i.e., Random Forest and AdaBoost combined … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar accuracy has been obtained using advanced signal processing techniques based on the persistent homology of delay embedding [3]. Although the literature mentions the importance of ensemble classifiers in the decision making related to asthma patients [18,19], there is no paper, based on our knowledge, that investigates more deeply the efficiency of ensemble methods in wheezing detection in comparison to individual classifiers. In addition, the majority of the experimental results are evaluated based on the breathing record acquired under the controlled condition from the adult patients [29].…”
Section: The Research Overviewmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…A similar accuracy has been obtained using advanced signal processing techniques based on the persistent homology of delay embedding [3]. Although the literature mentions the importance of ensemble classifiers in the decision making related to asthma patients [18,19], there is no paper, based on our knowledge, that investigates more deeply the efficiency of ensemble methods in wheezing detection in comparison to individual classifiers. In addition, the majority of the experimental results are evaluated based on the breathing record acquired under the controlled condition from the adult patients [29].…”
Section: The Research Overviewmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Furthermore, it is simple, swift, and easy to use with an iterative algorithm which requires only one parameter, iteration number. Moreover, it is not subject to over-fitting and simply determines outliners which are incorrectly classified or are difficult to classify [21]. However, misclassified and/or difficult instances are given significance by gradient boosting (GB), via the remaining errors-also known as pseudo-residuals-of a strong learner.…”
Section: ) Boosting-based Techniques: Adaboost and Stochasticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both strategies have limitations such as loss of data with undersampling or overfitting with oversampling, and the effect of resampling has rarely been evaluated. 9 Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) is one way of achieving class balance. It is designed to generate new synthetic data that is coherent with the minority class distribution while minimising overfitting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%